The effectiveness of programs and the course of pregnancy during the transfer of thawed and fresh embryos

Authors

  • T.M. Dzhusubalieva
  • I.A. Muzychenko
  • G.A. Grebennikova
  • L.G. Baimurzaeva
  • V.G. Horun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM2020-1-23

Keywords:

Fresh program, FET (Frozen Embryo Transfer) program, “Take home baby” indicator

Abstract

In recent years, IVF programs have been increasingly carried out in which cryopreserved embryos are used. Along with these programs, IVF procedures are carried out, in which "fresh" embryos are transferred. The problem of choice naturally arises before reproductive specialists: which program to give preference to - FRESH and FET?
Specialists of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine (Almaty, RK) conducted a number of observations. After careful sampling of these data, no differences in CNB% were found in Fresh and FET (Frozen Embryo Transfer) programs. The incidence of complications during pregnancy and childbirth with FET protocols was significantly higher in comparison with Fresh, which requires further study. When analyzing the "Take home baby" indicator, there were no statistically significant differences between the FET and Fresh protocols.

References

Sha T, Yin X, Cheng W, Massey I. - « Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis.» Fertility and Sterility. - 2018;109(2):330-342.e9.

Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. - « Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. » Human Reproduction Update.- 2013;19:433-457.

Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB - « Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CONARTAS Group. » Human Reproduction. - 2013;28:2545-2553.

Aflatoonian A, Mansoori Moghaddam F. - « Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. » Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. - 2010;27:695-700.

Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J. - «Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles-time for a new embryo transfer strategy» Fertility and Sterility.- 2011;95:1691-1695.

Shuryigina O.V., Petrova A.A., Ivanova O.V., Byikova T.V., Kulakova O.V. Retrospektivnyiy analiz effektivnosti vitrifikatsii blastotsist cheloveka v praktike embriologicheskih laboratoriy. Reproduktivnaya meditsina. 2019. #4 (41). S.44-49.

Yah'yarova M.P., Dosalieva D.N. O rezultativnosti perenosa razmorozhennyih blastotsist v protokolah medlennoy zamorozki i vitrifikatsii. Reproduktivnaya meditsina. 2014. #1 (18). S.44-49

Additional Files

Published

2020-10-01

How to Cite

[1]
Dzhusubalieva Т. , Muzychenko И. , Grebennikova Г., Baimurzaeva Л. and Horun В. 2020. The effectiveness of programs and the course of pregnancy during the transfer of thawed and fresh embryos. Reproductive Medicine. 3 (44) (Oct. 2020), 23–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37800/RM2020-1-23.

Issue

No. 3 (44) (2020): Reproductive medicine

Section

Статьи

License

The articles published in this Journal are licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International) license, which provides for their non-commercial use only. Under this license, users have the right to copy and distribute the material in copyright but are not permitted to modify or use it for commercial purposes. Full details on the licensing are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.