Developmental anomalies of female genital organs in the practice of a reproductologist

Authors

  • Sh.K. Karibaeva
  • E.E. Mukhametova
  • A.S. Baibolat КазНМУ
  • A.Yu. Khramtsova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.3.2023.40-49

Keywords:

Congenital malformations of the female genital tract, Muller anomalies, infertility, diagnosis and treatment of abnormalities of the female reproductive system

Abstract

Relevance: Congenital malformations of the female genital tract are defined as deviations from normal anatomy resulting from embryonal underdevelopment of the Muller or paramesonephric ducts. Depending on the type and degree of anatomical distortions, they are associated with health and problems with reproductive function. Because of their prevalence (4-7%) and clinical importance, a reliable classification system seems extremely useful for their treatment. Effective categorization provides more effective diagnosis and treatment and a better understanding of their pathogenesis and reproductive outcomes.
The study aimed to review reproductive cases with Mullerian duct anomalies from the literature sources and the authors’ experience.
Materials and Methods: The PUBMED, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for literary sources published from January 2018 to January 2023. Out of 42 articles found, 16 were included in this literary review. Combinations of the following keywords were used for the search: «Anomalies of the female reproductive system,» «female genital organs,» «infertility and Mullerian anomaly,» and «diagnosis and treatment Mullerian anomaly.»

Results: Women with congenital anomalies of the Mullerian ducts have unfavorable pregnancy outcomes in at least 25% of cases. However, a pregnancy in an abnormal uterus can proceed without incident and end with a normal birth. The general approach to a woman with a Mullerian duct anomaly has improved over the years.
The emergence of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) enabled many patients with obstructive Mullerian duct anomalies to successfully conceive a child. In-vitro fertilization gives a chance for pregnancy to patients with a history of adhesions and salpingectomy due to retrograde menstruation, endometriosis, and adhesive disease. In the case of cervical agenesis, pregnancy can be achieved through transmyometrial embryo transfer.
Conclusion: A practicing reproductologist should be proficient in scientifically based methods of treating female reproductive system congenital anomalies. The growing success of ART is allowing infertile couples to procreate. Considering the most common anomalies and reproductive consequences for female patients, we believe infertility specialists can better advise their patients with congenital anomalies regarding family planning options and a favorable course of pregnancy.

References

Akhtar M.A., Saravelos S.H., Li T.C., Jayaprakasan K., the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies // BJOG. – 2020. – Vol. 127(5). – P. e1-e13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15968

Ludwin A., Pfeifer S.M. Reproductive surgery for müllerian anomalies: a review of progress in the last decade // Fertil. Steril. – 2019. – Vol. 112. – P. 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.005

Lin P.C., Bhatnagar K.P., Nettleton G.S., Nakajima S.T. Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction // Fertil. Steril. – 2002. – Vol. 78. – P. 899-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03368-х

Santana González L., Artibani M., Ashour A.A. Studying Müllerian duct anomalies – from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation // Dis. Model. Mech. – 2021. – Vol.14. – P. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.047977

Grimbizis G.F., Gordts S., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Brucker S., De Angelis C., Gergolet M., Li T.C., Tanos V., Brölmann H., Gianaroli L., Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies // Hum. Reprod. – 2013. – Vol. 28. – P. 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098

Gitas G., Eckhoff K., Rody A., Ertan A.K., Baum S., Hoffmans E., Alkatout I. An unprecedented occult non-communicating rudimentary uterine horn treated with laparoscopic excision and preservation of both fallopian tubes: a case report and review of the literature // J. Med. Case Rep. – 2021. – Vol.15. – P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-020-02636-х

Wilson D., Bordoni B. Embryology, Mullerian Ducts (Paramesonephric Ducts) // In: StatPearls. – Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32491659/

Herlin M.K., Petersen M.B., Brännström M. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (МРКХ) syndrome: a comprehensive update // Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. – 2020. – Vol. 15. – Art. no. 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01491-9

Tanitame K., Tanitame N., Urayama S., Ohtsu K. Congenital anomalies causing hemato/hydrocolpos: imaging findings, treatments, and outcomes // Jpn. J. Radiol. – 2021 – Vol. 39. – P. 733-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01115-7

Chen H.A., Grimshaw A.A., Taylor-Giorlando M., Vijayakumar P., Li D., Margetts M., Pelosi E., Vash-Margita A. Ovarian absence: a systematic literature review and case series report // J. Ovarian Res. – 2023. – Vol. 16. – Art. no. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01090-1

Ludwin A., Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice // Hum. Reprod. – 2015. – Vol. 30. – P. 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu344

Grimbizis G.F., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Saravelos S.H., Gordts S., Exacoustos C., Van Schoubroeck D., Bermejo C., Amso N.N., Nargund G., Timmermann D., Athanasiadis A., Brucker S., De Angelis C., Gergolet M., Li T.C., Tanos V., Tarlatzis B., Farquharson R., Gianaroli L., Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies // Gynecol. Surg. – 2016. – Vol. 13. – P. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098

Peero E.K., Badeghiesh A., Baghlaf H., Dahan M.H. What type of uterine anomalies had an additional effect on pregnancy outcomes, compared to other uterine anomalies? An evaluation of a large population database // J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. – 2022. – Vol. 35. – P. 10494-10501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2130240

Темникова М.О., Измалков Д.В. Алгоритм дифференциальной мр-диагностики удвоения, двурогой, перегородчатой и седловидной маток с применением метода мультипланарной реконструкции (обзор ли- тературы) [Temnikova M.O., Izmalkov D.V. Algoritm differencial'noĭ mr-diagnostiki udvoeniya, dvurogoĭ, peregorodchatoĭ i sedlovidnoĭ matok s primeneniem metoda mul'tiplanarnoĭ rekonstrukcii (obzor literatury) (in Russ.)]. https://univerexpert.ru/upload/pdf/temnicova_Izmalkov_4_.pdf

Ludwin A. Septum resection does not improve reproductive outcomes: truly? // Hum. Reprod. – 2020. – Vol. 35. – P. 1495-1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa142

Rikken J.F.W., Kowalik C.R., Emanuel M.H., Bongers M.Y., Spinder T., Jansen F.W., Mulders A.G.M.G.J., Padmehr R., Clark T.J., van Vliet H.A., Stephenson M.D., van der Veen F., Mol B.W.J., van Wely M., Goddijn M. Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial // Hum. Reprod. – 2021. – Vol. 36. – P. 1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab037

Локшина А. Анализ рынка медицинских услуг в сфере ВРТ и маркетинговая стратегия медицинских учреждений в Казахстане на примере работы МЦКР PERSONA // Репрод. Мед. – 2020. – № 4(45). – С. 38-47 [Lokshina A. Analiz rynka medicinskix uslug v sfere VRT i marketingovaya strategiya medicinskix uchrezhdenij v Kazaxstane na primere raboty MCKR PERSONA // Reprod. Med. – 2020. – № 4(45). – S. 38-47 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37800/RM2020-1-39

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

[1]
Karibaeva Ш., Mukhametova Э., Baibolat А. and Khramtsova А. 2023. Developmental anomalies of female genital organs in the practice of a reproductologist. Reproductive Medicine. 3(56) (Oct. 2023), 40–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.3.2023.40-49.