Modern approaches to assessing the readiness of the organism for labor and the success of labor induction: A literary review

Authors

  • D.D. Sultanmuratova КМУ "ВШОЗ"
  • S.Sh. Isenova
  • А.S. Abdykalyk
  • D.А. Аbdieva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.1.2023.42-49

Keywords:

Induced labor, predictors of induction efficiency

Abstract

Relevance: Labor induction is one of the most common obstetric interventions. The rate of labor induction has continued to rise over the past few decades. However, despite its wide prevalence, induced labor is still the most controversial topic in obstetrics, as there is no consensus on indications and contraindications, timing, methods of induction, criteria for effectiveness, and predictors of its effectiveness. In the era of personalized medicine, it becomes increasingly important to select the optimal delivery method for each pregnant woman individually, taking into account the preferences of the woman, anamnesis, and objective and instrumental data. Based on this, models that predict vaginal delivery after induction are constantly being developed and tested.
The study aimed to analyze the predictive models of successful induction of labor using modern diagnostic methods and evaluate the methodology, strengths, and weaknesses of published models to determine the direction of future research.
Materials and Methods: This review includes an analysis of published data on predictors of the effectiveness of induced labor over the past five years. Literature searches were conducted in the following databases: Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Willey, and The Cochrane Library. The search was conducted by keywords (induced labor, predictors of IR effectiveness) using MeSH. The analysis included 26 studies.
Results: Today, new methods are being developed based on clinical and biochemical parameters and mathematical models for a more objective assessment of the body’s readiness for childbirth and the success of induced labor. However, none can currently be recommended for clinical use as they are limited in scope, methodology, and/or efficacy, requiring further study.
Conclusion: Thus, induced labor is still one of the most controversial topics and requires further study. Subsequent research should aim to create objective and reliable methods for determining the predictors of the effectiveness of induction to develop an optimal algorithm for choosing methods of pre-induction and induction of labor.

References

РЦРЗ. Индукция родов: клинические протоколы МЗ РК. Протокол от 13 января 2023 года, № 177 [RCRZ Indukciya rodov: klinicheskie protokoly MZ RK. Protocol ot 13 yanvarya 2017, № 177 (in Russ.)]. https://diseases.medelement.com/disease/-2022/17523.

Kehl S., Hösli I., Pecks U., Reif Ph., Schild R., Schmidt M., Schmitz, Schwarz, D.Ch. Surbek D., Abou-Dakn M. Induction of Labour: guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG // Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. – 2020. – Vol. 81(8). – P. 870-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1519-7713.

WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on induction of labour for women beyond 41 weeks of gestation. The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization. 29.08.2021. https://srhr.org/rhl/article/who-recommendation-on-induction-of-labour-for-women-beyond-41-weeks-of-gestation.

Middleton Ph., Shepherd E., Crowther C. A. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2019. – Vol. 221. – P. 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJOG.2019.02.046

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Inducing Labour Guideline. Draft for consultation, May 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng207/documents/draft-guideline-2.

Исенова С.Ш., Радзинский В.Е., Исина Г.М, Бищекова Б.Н., Кыпшакбаева Ж.Н., Кабыл Б.К., Зият Л.С., Али Г.А., Асемов А.Б. Использование синтетического аналога простагландина Е1 (мизопростол) Per os для созревания шейки матки // Репродуктивная Медицина. – 2022. – № 2(51). – С. 77-83 [Isenova S.Sh., Radzinskij V.E., Isina G.M, Bishhekova B.N., Kypshakbaeva Zh.N., Kabyl B.K., Ziyat L.S., Ali G.A., Asemov A.B. Ispol’zovanie sinteticheskogo analoga prostaglandina E1 (mizoprostol) Per os dlya sozrevaniya shejki matki // Reproduktivnaya Medicina. – 2022. – № 2(51). – S. 77-83 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.2.2022.77-83.

Kruit H., Heikinheimo O., Sorsa, T., Juhila J., Paavonen. J., Rahkonen L. Cervical biomarkers as predictors of successful induction of labouRby Foley catheter // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. – 2018. – Vol. 38(7). – P. 927-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1434763

Rathore A., Sharma, R. Kar R., Tandon A., Suneja A., Guleria K. Role of Cervical Phosphorylated Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 1 (phIGFBP1) for Prediction of Successful Induction Among Primigravida with Prolonged Pregnancy // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. – 2021. – Vol. 71(1). – P. 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13224-020-01372-Y

Cowman W., Scroggins S.M., Hamilton W. S., Karras A., Bowdler N. C., Devor E. J., M. Santillan K., Santillan D. A. Association between plasma leptin and cesarean section after induction of labor: a case control study // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. – 2022. – Vol. 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-021-04372-6

Lau S.L, Kwan A., Tse W.T., Poon L.C. The use of ultrasound, fibronectin and other parameters to predict the success of labour induction // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. Baillière Tindall. – 2022. – Vol. 79. – P. 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BPOBGYN.2021.10.002

Anikwe C. C., Okorochukwu, B. Uchendu C. E., Ikeoha C. C. The Effect of Ultrasound-Measured Preinduction Cervical Length on Delivery Outcome in a Low-Resource Setting // Sci. World J. – 2020. – Vol. 5 (4). – P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8273154

Vince K., Poljičanin T., Matijević R. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes // J. Perinat. Med. – 2022. – Vol. 50. – P. 9. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM-2022-0140.

Kwon J. Y., Wie J. H., Choi S. K., Park S., Kim S. M., Park I. Y. The degree of cervical length shortening as a predictor of successful or failed labor induction // Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2021. – Vol. 60, no. 3. – P. 503-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TJOG.2021.03.020.

Abdullah Z.H.A., Chew K.T., Velayudham V.R.V., Yahaya Z., Jamil A.A.M., Abu M.A., Ghani N.A.A., Ismail N.A.M. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial // PLoS One. – 2022. – Vol. 17. – P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0262387.

Al-Adwy A.M., Sobh S.M., Belal D.S., Omran E.F., Hassan A., Saad A.H., Afifi M.M., Nada A.M.. Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. – 2018. – Vol. 141, no. 1. – P. 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJGO.12425.

Kim E.J., Heo J.M., Kim H.Y., Ahn K.H., Cho G.J., Hong S.C., Oh M.J., Lee N.W., Kim H.J. The Value of Posterior Cervical Angle as a Predictor of Vaginal Delivery: A Preliminary Study // Diagnostics. – 2021. – Vol. 11, no. 11. – Art. ID: 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111977.

Massó P., Callejas A., Melchor J., Molina F. S., Rus,G. In Vivo Measurement of Cervical Elasticity on Pregnant Women by Torsional Wave Technique: A Preliminary Study // Sensors. – 2019. – Vol. 19, no. 15. – Art. ID: 3249. https://doi.org/10.3390/S19153249.

Lu J., Kwun Y., Cheng Y., Yee S., Ho S. , Sahota D. S., Hui L. L., Poon L.C., Leung T. Y.. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. – 2020. – Vol. 99(1). – P. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13706.

Strobel M. K. , Helen M. E., Köster A., Möllers M., Braun J., Santis Ch.de, Oelmeier K., Klockenbusch W., Schmitz R. Cervical elastography strain ratio and strain pattern for the prediction of a successful induction of labour // J. Perinat. Med. – 2021. – Vol. 49, no. 2. – P. 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0189

Jensen M.S., Thomsen C.R., Hinge M., Uldbjerg N., Sandager.P. Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix and prediction of successful labour induction // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. – 2021. – Vol. 58, no. S1. – P. 292-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.24673

Zhou Y., Jin N., Chen Q., Lv Min, Jiang Y., Chen Y., Xi F., Yang M., Zhao B., Huang H., Luo Q. Predictive value of cervical length by ultrasound and cervical strain elastography in labor induction at term // J. Int. Med. Res. – 2021. – Vol. 49, no. 2. – P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520985338/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0300060520985338-FIG2.JPEG

Thomsen Ch. R., Schmidt , Jensen M ., Uldbjerg S. N. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. – 2022. – Vol. 101, no. 2. – P. 241- 247. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14309

Torres J., Muñoz M., Porcel M.D. Contreras ,Francisca S,G. Rus, Hernández O. Preliminary Results on the Preinduction Cervix Status by Shear Wave Elastography // Mathematics. – 2022. – Vol. 10, no. 17. – Art. ID: 3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173164.

Meier K., Parrish J., D’Souza R. Prediction models for determining the success of labor induction: A systematic review // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. – 2019. – Vol. 98(9). – P. 1100-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/AOGS.13589.

Ильмуратова С., Манжуова Л., Локшин В. Особенности состояния здоровья детей, родившихся в результате применения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий // Репродуктивная медицина. – 2022. – №1(50). – С. 15-22 [Il’muratova S., Manzhuova L., Lokshin V. Osobennosti sostoyaniya zdorov’ya detej, rodivshixsya v rezul’tate primeneniya vspomogatel’nyx reproduktivnyx texnologij // Reproduktivnaya medicina. – 2022. – №1(50). – S. 15-22 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.1.2022.15-22

Локшин В.Н., Ильмуратова С.Х. Когнитивное развитие и нервно-психическое здоровье детей, зачатых с помощью вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий // Акушерство и Гинекология. – 2022. – №11. – С. 31- 36 [Lokshin V.N., Il’muratova S.X. Kognitivnoe razvitie i nervno-psixicheskoe zdorov’e detej, zachatyx s pomoshh’yu vspomogatel’nyx reproduktivnyx texnologij // Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. – 2022. – №11. – S. 31-36 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.18565/AIG.2022.11.31-36

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

[1]
Sultanmuratova Д., Isenova С., Abdykalyk А. and Аbdieva Д. 2023. Modern approaches to assessing the readiness of the organism for labor and the success of labor induction: A literary review. Reproductive Medicine. 1(54) (Mar. 2023), 42–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.1.2023.42-49.

Issue

No. 1(54) (2023): Reproductive medicine

Section

Статьи

License

The articles published in this Journal are licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International) license, which provides for their non-commercial use only. Under this license, users have the right to copy and distribute the material in copyright but are not permitted to modify or use it for commercial purposes. Full details on the licensing are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.