Optimization of referral routing for pregnant women with risk factors for gestational diabetes at the primary health care level: development and implementation of a standardized checklist

Authors

  • A.A. Eszhanova Astana Medical University
  • J.A. Rizaev
  • L.R. Agababyan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.3.2026.843

Keywords:

gestational diabetes mellitus , screening, predictors, routing, primary healthcare , checklist, logistic regression

Abstract

Relevance: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a pressing medical and social problem, as its development is associated with an increased risk of obstetric complications and adverse perinatal outcomes. The effectiveness of prevention and early detection largely depends on the quality of primary health care (PHC) organization, where a pregnant woman’s first visit and risk-factor assessment take place.

Mechanisms for early identification of at-risk patients and their timely referral for specialized examinations still need improvement. Developing and implementing a standardized checklist at the PHC level will standardize the GDM risk assessment process, improve continuity between stages of medical care, and create conditions for earlier initiation of preventive and therapeutic measures.

The study aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical checklist and referral algorithm for the early identification of pregnant women at high risk of GDM.

Materials and Methods: Based on a retrospective cohort study of 600 delivery records (300 with GDM, 300 controls), we identified GDM predictors using multivariate logistic regression and ROC analysis.

Results: We developed a prognostic risk scale for GDM (AUC = 0.849). Cut-off points and score weights for predictors were: chronic arterial hypertension (3 points), previous GDM(3 points), BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²(3 points), HbA1c ≥ 5.51%(2 points), fasting glucose ≥ 4.81 mmol/L(2 points), positive family history(2 points), age ≥ 30 years(1 point). A total score ≥ 3 showed high sensitivity and specificity for GDM development. We proposed an early referral algorithm for pregnant women before 12 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion: Implementing the modified checklist in practice allows general practitioners to shift from late screening to personalized targeted prevention of GDM.

References

1. Marushko RV, Goida NG, Dudina OO, Marushko TL. Assessment of the efficiency of perinatal care in Ukraine. Ukr J Perinatol Pediatr. 2023;1(93):26–36. https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2023.93.26

2. Quak XES, Sultana R, Aau WK, Goh CC, Tan NC. A 3-year retrospective study of unintended pregnancy in a developed multi-ethnic Asian community: a call for better healthcare system for family planning. Front Public Health. 2022;10:996696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.996696

3. Morris RK, Johnstone E, Lees C, Morton V, Smith G; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Investigation and care of a small-for-gestational-age fetus and a growth-restricted fetus (Green-top Guideline No. 31). BJOG. 2024;131(9):e31–e80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17814

4. Patel SY, Akileswaran C, Basu S. Early detection of high risk pregnancies using clinical and social data to improve health outcomes. npj Digit Public Health. 2026;1:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44482-025-00003-5

5. Мойынбаева Ш., Куракбаев К., Калдыбаев Г., Еркенова С. Систематический обзор прогностических моделей оценки риска осложнений беременности и их роль в оптимизации перинатальной помощи. Репрод Мед (Центр Азия). 2026;2:60–68.

6. Moyynbayeva Sh, Kurakbayev K, Kaldybayev G, Yerkenova S. A systematic review of predictive models for assessing the risk of pregnancy complications and their role in optimizing perinatal care. Reprod Med (Centr Asia). 2026;2:60–68. Russian.

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.2.2026.737

7. Turgay B, Zorlu U, Kılıçkıran H, Turgay K, Aynaoğlu Yıldız G, Yapar Eyi EG, Ozgu-Erdinc AS. Predictive value of OGTT parameters and clinical markers in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective randomized controlled trial from a tertiary center in Türkiye. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2026;17:1793806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1793806

8. Andersen AS, Linneberg Rathcke S, Tang Christensen T, Sørensen A. The association between second trimester ultrasound fetal biometrics and gestational diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:139–143.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.015

9. Xu Y, Wei Q, Zhang L, Duan MF, Wang YM, Huang N. Sequential screening strategy in early, middle, and late pregnancy in women at high risk of hyperglycemia. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:829388.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.829388

10. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(Suppl. 1):S27–S49.

11. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on care for women with diabetes during pregnancy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. 76 p. ISBN: 978-92-4-011704-4.

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240117044

Downloads

Published

01.10.2026

How to Cite

Eszhanova , A., Rizaev , J., & Agababyan , L. (2026). Optimization of referral routing for pregnant women with risk factors for gestational diabetes at the primary health care level: development and implementation of a standardized checklist. Reproductive Medicine (Central Asia), (3), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.3.2026.843

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.