Optimization of second-stage labor management in fetal macrosomia: A retrospective single-center analysis

Authors

  • D.E. Omertaeva
  • М.М. Mugazov НАО "МУК"
  • К.Т. Shykhaliyeva
  • Zh.T. Amirbekova
  • A.D. Uvasheva
  • G.A. Akzhol
  • Г.К. Tuleuova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.2.2026.610

Keywords:

fetal macrosomia, second stage of labor, operative vaginal delivery, obstetric complications, neonatal trauma

Abstract

Relevance: Fetal macrosomia (birth weight ≥ 4000 g) is associated with an increased risk of second-stage labor complications, including prolonged bearing-down, birth trauma, and the need for emergency operative delivery. The optimal duration and management strategy of the second stage in cases of macrosomia remain subjects of ongoing debate.

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of second-stage duration on maternal and neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal macrosomia and to develop practical recommendations for optimizing obstetric management.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 15,285 vaginal deliveries at ≥37 weeks of gestation (01.2020-12.2024) at Perinatal Center No.1, Karaganda. Comparison groups: macrosomia (estimated fetal weight ≥ 4000 g, n = 1,456) vs. normosomia (<4000 g, n = 13,829). Evaluated parameters included: second stage-duration, frequency of operative vaginal delivery (OVD), emergency cesarean section, maternal complications (3rd-4th degree perineal tears, blood loss ≥500 ml), and neonatal outcomes (birth trauma, Apgar score, NICU admission).

Results: The average second-stage duration in the macrosomia group was 68.4±22.3 minutes, compared with 54.8±16.2 minutes in the control group (p<0.001). Duration >90 minutes increased the risk of maternal complications by 3.2 times (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4-4.3) and neonatal trauma by 2.8 times (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9-4.1). OVD in macrosomia was associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk of shoulder dystocia (OR 5.1; 95% CI 2.1-12.4). The optimal duration for bearing down was 75 minutes (sensitivity 71%, specificity 68% for predicting complications).

 Conclusion: In cases of fetal macrosomia, active management of the second stage is recommended with reconsideration of the strategy if the duration exceeds 75 minutes, avoidance of routine OVD, and enhanced readiness for obstetric maneuvers.

References

1. Koyanagi Quezada-Robles A, Quispe-Sarmiento F, Bendezu-Quispe G, Vargas-Fernández R. Fetal Macrosomia and Postpartum Hemorrhage in Latin American and Caribbean Region: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;45(11):e706-e723.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772597

2. Youssefzadeh AC, Tavakoli A, Panchal VR Incidence trends of shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors: A nationwide analysis in the United States. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162(2):578-589.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14699

3. Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long-term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ. 2020;368:m1049.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1049

4. Mendez-Figueroa H, Hoffman MK, Grantz KL, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Chauhan SP. Shoulder dystocia and composite adverse outcomes for the maternal-neonatal dyad. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(4):100359.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100359

5. Tsikouras P, Kotanidou S, Nikolettos K, Kritsotaki N, Bothou A, Andreou S, Nalmpanti T, Chalkia K, Spanakis V, Peitsidis P, Iatrakis G, Nikolettos N. Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diagnosis, Prevention, Complications, Prognosis, and Management. J Pers Med. 2024 May 30;14(6):586.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14060586

6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):e149-e170.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003850

7. Patel RR, Murphy DJ, Peters TJ. Operative vaginal delivery in the second stage of labour: a cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity. BJOG. 2020;127(5):620-629.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16065

8. French CB, Young BC, Golen T. Shoulder Dystocia: Neonatal Implications. Neoreviews. 2022;23(9):e645-e649.

https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.23-9-e645

9. Fuglsang J. Shoulder dystocia-Still a feared complication. How can we improve? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(10):1908-1909.

https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14952

10. Sandström A, Altman M, Cnattingius S, et al. Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study. J Perinatol. 2020;40(2):236-244.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0547-6

11. Thurin-Kjellberg A, Carlsson Y, Bergh C. Randomized controlled trial of total duration of pushing in the second stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(4):652-659.

https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14030

12. Talgatbek A, Maidanova Z, Zubkov D, Amirbekova Z, Omertaeva D, Mugazov M. Multifactorial analysis of the effect of albumin, creatinine, and TIMP-2 levels in acute kidney injury in pregnant women in the third trimester: Сlinical research. Reproductive Medicine (Central Asia). 2025;1:127-133. Russian.

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.1.2025.455

13. Gimovsky AC, Guarente J, Berghella V. Prolonged second stage in nulliparous with epidurals: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(3):500-508.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1490720

14. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6:e005671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671

15. Национальный центр общественного здравоохранения Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан. Статистический сборник «Здоровье населения Республики Казахстан и деятельность организаций здравоохранения в 2023 году». Астана; 2024.

https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31760051

16. Omertayeva D, Mugazov M, Vazenmiller D, Shykhaliyeva K, Kaibassova A. Mean platelet volume, corpuscular volume, and hemoglobin levels impact the risk of severe preeclampsia in pregnancy. Reproductive Medicine (Central Asia). 2024;4:75-80. Russian.

https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.4.2024.412

17. Jeppegaard M, Larsen MH, Thams AB Incidence of shoulder dystocia and risk factors for recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy–A historical register-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(10):1975-1984.

https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14784

18. Akinmola OO, Okusanya BO, Olorunfemi G, Okpara HC, Azinge EC. Fetal macrosomia, fetal insulin, and insulin-like growth factor- 1 among neonates in Lagos, Nigeria: A case-control study. PLoS One. 2022 Aug 24;17(8):e0266314.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266314

19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 804: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):e178-e188.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003772

20. Bothou A, Apostolidi DM, Tsikouras P, Iatrakis G, Sarella A, Iatrakis D, Peitsidis P, Gerente A, Anthoulaki X, Nikolettos N, Zervoudis S. Overview of techniques to manage shoulder dystocia during vaginal birth. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5:48.

https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/142097

Published

01.07.2026

How to Cite

Omertaeva, D., Mugazov М., Shykhaliyeva К., Amirbekova, Z., Uvasheva, A., Akzhol, G., & Tuleuova Г. (2026). Optimization of second-stage labor management in fetal macrosomia: A retrospective single-center analysis. Reproductive Medicine (Central Asia), (2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.2.2026.610

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.